Jak Dailymail uvedl, Clintonová se hlásí k 18. generaci svých prarodičů přes rodinu Rodhamů z otcovy strany, Trump je s ní příbuzný přes svou matku Mary Anne Macleodovou, která se narodila ve Skotsku. Podle webu MyHeritage.com lze linie Hillary Clintonové i Donalda Trumpa dohledat až k Janovi z Gentu, 1. vévodovi z Lancasteru a jeho třetí ženě, Katherine Swynfordové. Jan z Gentu byl jedním ze synů krále Eduarda III.

Král Eduard III. je součástí rodu Plantagenetů a je potomkem Jana Bezzemka, což znamená, že i nejnovější prezident Spojených států má stejnou pokrevní linii a původ. Tím se Donald Trump dostává do skupiny amerických prezidentů se stejným předkem, na což přišla dívka jménem BridgeAnne d'Avignon. Další informace viz níže.

12letá BridgeAnne d'Avignon se při genealogickém výzkumu svého vlastního rodokmenu rozhodla pokusit se dešifrovat genealogii prezidentů Spojených států. Při svém výzkumu čítajícím přinejmenším 500 tisíc historických jmen se snažila prohledat předky všech amerických prezidentů a zjistit, zda náhodou neexistuje nějaký „prezidentský Adam“, který by je všechny spojoval. Kupodivu zjistila, že 42 ze 43 amerických prezidentů spojuje jeden člověk: Jan Bezzemek, král Anglie (1199-1216).

Pokud znáte teorie o Iluminátech, čili elitním rodinám vládnoucím světu. možná vás nepřekvapí, že VŠICHNI američtí prezidenti (s výjimkou jednoho), včetně Bushů, Billa Clintona, Jimmyho Cartera i Baracka Obamy, jsou vlastně bratranci a potomci Jana Bezzemka. Jediným prezidentem, kterého se BridgeAnne nepodařilo linií spojit, byl Martin Van Buren, 8. prezident Spojených států. Co se týče ostatních, ti jsou nejen potomky Jana Bezzemka, ale také vzdálenými bratranci Alžběty II., královny Anglie, a potažmo také britské královské rodiny.

Jan Bezzemek byl králem Anglie v letech 1199 až 1216. Je známý podepsáním tzv. Magna Carta (Velké listiny práv a svobod) v roce 1215 a ztrátou vévodství Normandie na úkor francouzského krále Filipa II. Augusta, což mu vysloužilo přídomek Bezzemek. Byl také popisován jako padouch v přítěžích o Robinu Hoodovi.

originální text: curiousmindmagazine.com

The press, led by the Daily Mail and the New York Daily News, recently hailed the ‘remarkable discovery’ made by 12 year-old Californian genealogist BridgeAnne d’Avignon that 42 out of 43 US presidents have King John of England as a common ancestor.

But the most remarkable aspect of this story would be if Van Buren wasn’t descended from King John as well.

Boasting ‘royal blood’ isn’t about being born with a silver spoon in your mouth – even some US Presidents, such as Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, had famously humble backgrounds – it’s about mathematical probability.  Andrew Millard of the University of Durham calculated the probability that anyone with Anglo-Saxon ancestry descends from King Edward III (1312-1377) to be as high as 99.997%, and conservatively estimated that Edward III has around 100 million descendants in the British Isles, Europe and former British colonies, including the USA, Canada and Australia.

The reason why US Presidents, or you and I, can claim royal ancestry is down to what genealogists call ‘pedigree collapse’.  This happens when relatives (no matter how distantly related) marry, produce offspring and narrow a family tree through duplicate appearances on it.  The further back you go, the more duplicates you’ll find through multiple lines of descent.

If you trace your lineage back over generations, the theoretical number of individual ancestors in your tree grows exponentially and soon exceeds the population from which your ancestors could possibly be drawn.  If you go back 30 generations to the Middle Ages you would theoretically have over 1 billion ancestors on that generation line of your family tree, more than the population of the whole world at the time.  If you go back a further 10 generations to the Dark Ages you would have over a trillion ancestors, at a time when the planet’s population was around 200 million.  Divide your theoretical 1 trillion ancestors by the real population of 200 million, and the average ancestor would appear on your family tree 5,000 times.  This assumes of course that all of the 200 million alive in the Dark Ages were capable of producing children – many didn’t and so wouldn’t appear on anybody’s family tree, meaning that your more prolific ancestors would actually appear many more than 5,000 times.

Demographer Kenneth Wachter first illustrated this in his 1980 book Ancestors at the Norman Conquest, which calculated that in 1977 an average Englishman born in 1947 would have had 32,768 theoretical ancestors 15 generations ago (at 30 years between generations), around 1527 AD; of these, 96% would have been ‘real’ and 4% duplicates.  Going back 20 generations to 1377 AD and he would have over 1 million theoretical ancestors, 40% of which would be duplicates.  25 generations ago, around 1227 AD – not long after the reign of King John – he would have over 32 million theoretical ancestors, 94% of which would be duplicates and only 6% ‘real’, i.e. 2 million, or 80% of the estimated English population of 2.5 million at that time.

I’ve found an instance in my family tree where one individual, Nicholas Rimmer (1657-1717), features twice as an ancestor; once as my 8 x great grandfather through my direct paternal line, and again as my 8th x great grandfather through the lineage of a 4 x great grandmother.  My case of pedigree collapse is very mild compared to that of Alfonso XIII of Spain (1886-1931), who only had 4 great-grandparents instead of the expected 8 because of royal inbreeding.

Your true family tree is therefore diamond-shaped rather than an inverted pyramid.  The further back you go, the number of ancestors in each generation increases steadily up to a point, then slows, stops, then reduces.  And as there are fewer people to put on the branches of the 7 billion family trees of people living today, it is a mathematical certainty that, at some point, there will be an ancestor who appears at least once on everybody’s tree – the ‘most recent common ancestor’ of all humans currently alive.  A team led by Joseph Chang, a Yale professor of statistics, produced a complex computer model to estimate that this point was likely around 2,000 to 3,000 years ago.

The model accounted for complexities such as social barriers, physical barriers of geography and migration, and the impact of known events within the last 20,000 years.  It also introduced the ‘identical ancestors point’, between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago, where everybody living today has exactly the same set of ancestors.  In other words, every person who was alive at that time is either an ancestor to all 6.5 billion people living today, or their line died out and they have no remaining descendants.

This worldwide genealogical web is not so difficult to spin.  If the history of mankind has one common theme, it is our ability to get around the planet, whether it is the migration of the first Siberian hunter gatherers into North America; the conquering armies of Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great; the raping and pillaging hordes of Vikings, Mongols, and Huns; the Empire builders of Spain, Portugal and Britain; the refugees of the Irish Potato Famine; or even the odd shipwrecked sailor.  It takes just one ancestral link to a ‘foreign’ cultural group among your millions of ancestors, and you share ancestors with everyone in that group.  Through this, some geneticists estimate that everybody on Earth is at least 50th cousin to everybody else.

As Joseph Chang’s team concluded, “No matter the languages we speak or the colour of our skin, we share ancestors who planted rice on the banks of the Yangtze, who first domesticated horses on the steppes of the Ukraine, who hunted giant sloths in the forests of North and South America, and who laboured to build the Great Pyramid of Khufu.”

Or as statistician Jotun Hein of Oxford University remarked, “Had you entered any village on Earth in around 3,000 BC, the first person you would have met would probably be your ancestor.”

None of this should downplay the commendable work of a 12 year-old amateur genealogist in claiming that 42 out of 43 US Presidents descend from King John.  But it’s not a remarkable coincidence that suggests a genetic ‘quest for power’.  The remarkable bit is the statistical certainty which makes it so.  And consider this: 2,000 years from now it is likely that everyone on Earth will be descended from most of us; and if you have a line of descendants that doesn’t die out, you will also eventually become an ancestor of the whole world.

All Presidents are Related By Blood - Including Most World Leaders!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conspiracy theory or is it merely a fact? Sure some may feel as though it has been debunked automatically, by way of former President Obama being a President of the United States, but they’re wrong. Well, at least from what has been proven so far. 

For starters, all 44 U.S. Presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. 

In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election. 

“This information comes from Burke’s Peerage, which is the Bible of aristocratic genealogy, based in London. Every presidential election in America, since and including George Washington in 1789 to Bill Clinton, has been won by the candidate with the most British and French royal genes. Of the 42 presidents to Clinton, 33 have been related to two people: 

Alfred the Great, King of England, and Charlemagne, the most famous monarch of France. So it goes on: 19 of them are related to England’s Edward III, who has 2000 blood connections to Prince Charles. 

The same goes with the banking families in America. George Bush and Barbara Bush are from the same bloodline – the Pierce bloodline, which changed its name from Percy, when it crossed the Atlantic. Percy is one of the aristocratic families of Britain, to this day. They were involved in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament at the time of Guy Fawkes” -Researcher/Author David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center” 

If America declared its Independence from the European monarchies in 1776, how is it possible that every single president has descended from European monarchs? 

If presidents are democratically elected as we are told, what are the odds that we would always choose members of British and French royal bloodlines to lead us? 

“The Americas have always been owned and governed by the same royal families of Britain and Europe that conventional history states as being among those defeated during the wars of so-called ‘Independence.’” -Michael Tsarion, “Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology” 

“If it really is the Land of the Free and if, as is claimed, anyone really can become the president, you would fairly expect that the 43 presidents from George Washington to George W. Bush would express that genetic diversity. You’re having a laugh. The presidents of the United States are as much a royal dynasty as anything in Europe, from whence their bloodlines came.” -David Icke, “Tales from the Time Loop” 

Researchers like David Icke, Michael Tsarion, and Fritz Springmeier, along with foundations like the New England Historical Genealogy Society, Burkes Peerage, the Roman Piso Homepage, and other reliable genealogical sources have documented these royal presidential bloodlines. 

Actually, by branching out far enough on the presidential family tree, the dedicated researcher will find that all 44 presidents share kinship, belonging to the same general ancestry, often called the 13th Illuminati bloodline, the Merovingian line, and/or the Windsor-Bush bloodline. 

“If you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from this line …A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been won by the candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by ballot, they are chosen by blood!” -David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline” 

Granted the relationships are sometimes distant 10th or 15th cousins, but in a country with hundreds of millions to choose from, this simply cannot be chance or coincidence. Gary Boyd Roberts, a genealogist at the New England Historic Genealogical Society thoroughly traced these connections in his book “Ancestors of American Presidents.” George W. Bush himself is directly related to 16 former U.S. presidents including George Washington, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland, Teddy Roosevelt, William H. Taft, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford. 

Bush is closely related to the king of Albania and has kinship with every member of the British royal family and the House of Windsor. He is related to 20 British Dukes, the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth. He is 13th cousin once removed from Prince Charles and has direct descent from King Henry III, Charles II, and Edward I of England. Through the House of Windsor and King Henry III, the Bush’s and Bill Clinton are genetically related as well. 

“According to Burke’s Peerage, even according to the official genealogy, Bill Clinton is genetically related to the House of Windsor, the present royal family in Britain; to every Scottish monarch; to King Henry III of England; and to Robert I of France.” -David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center” 

In 2004 George W. Bush ran as a “Republican” against “Democrat” John Forbes Kerry – his 16th cousin. These cousins, related to the same British and French monarchs, are also secret society brothers in the infamous Skull and Bones fraternity. 

John Kerry descends from King Henry II of England and Richard the Lionheart, leader of the third Christian crusade in 1189. He also has links to royalty in Albania, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Persia, and France, but still not enough royal genes to top George Bush. Earlier in 2000 we see the same story – George W. Bush ran neck and neck with Al Gore; another supposed democrat and cousin of the Bush family. 

“Al Gore is a descendant of Edward I, Roman Emperors Louis I, II, and Charles II and is direct descendant of Charlemagne which makes him a distant cousin of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. So the top “democratic” candidates against Bush in 2000 and 2004 were actually his cousins!” -Michael Tsarion, “Where History Ends DVD” 

“Never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances. There has always been a significant “royal factor,” in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among others, all boasting blue blood links. Al Gore…a descendant of Edward I, he is also a cousin of former U.S. President Richard Nixon, who resigned from the White House in 1974 for his part in the Watergate scandal. However, Al Gore does have direct links to the Holy Roman Empire. He is descendant of Roman Emperors Louis II, Charles II, and Louis I and is therefore also a direct descendant of Charlemagne, the eighth-century Emperor. The problem is that Gore’s Charlemagne links also make him a cousin of George W. Bush.” -Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage 

Publishing Director from p. 7, NEXUS magazine, Vol. 8, No 1, January-February edition 

By placing bloodline members on both sides of America’s faux political dichotomy, the old monarchs have guaranteed their right to throne under the guise of democratic elections. Back in 1996 we see the same tactic as “Democrat” Bill Clinton defeated “Republican” Bob Dole, his cousin. 

“Even Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, who ‘opposed’ each other at the 1996 election, are distant cousins. They can trace their ancestry to England’s King Henry III, who reigned from 1227 to 1273, and US Presidents William Henry and Benjamin Harrison …Clinton has far more royal blood than Dole and is directly descended from the same bloodline as the House of Windsor, every Scottish monarch, and King Robert I of France. This is why he was the Brotherhood’s choice.” -David Icke, “The Biggest Secret” (191-192) 

The Windsor-Bush bloodline reaches from the American presidents, back to British/European royalty, and it doesn’t stop there. It continues back through Roman emperors, all the way to Babylonian Kings and Egyptian Pharaohs near the beginning of recorded history. 

From Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI, the French line continues back through Louis XV-I, Charles XI-I, Henry IV-I, Philip V-I, Robert II and many other French monarchs. It passes the de Medici family, specifically Queen Catherine de Medici of France, who supported Columbus’ expedition to the “New World” along with bloodline Queen Isabella of Castile, King Ferdinand of Spain, and the House of Lorraine. It was also Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand who started the 350 year Spanish Inquisition, which ordered the murder of millions who refused to convert to Christianity. And from the House of Lorraine, Duke Godfroi de Bouillon became the first Crusader King of Jerusalem. 

“Father George and wife Barbara [Bush] are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount … Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline …So when George W. Bush, a descendant of the de Bouillon through his mother and father, talked of a “Crusade” against “Islamic” terrorism…this was no slip of the tongue…as was reported” – David Icke “Alice In Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster” 

The British line goes back from Prince William and Harry, through Prince Charles and Princess Diana, to Queen Elizabeth II, King George VI and V, King Edward VII, Queen Victoria, King Edward III, II, I, and King George III, II, I. Then it passes through King James I who ordered and financed the now most-widely read version of the Bible. Before James came Mary Stuart, King Henry III, II, I, King John (signer of the Magna Carta) and back to the Plantagenet and Habsburg dynasties under the Roman Empire. Other branches carried the bloodline to Scotland, Austria, Germany, Spain, Sweden and even Mexico: 

“This same bloodline also includes key Scottish families like the Lords of Galloway and the Comyns; Marie-Louise of Austria, who married Napoleon Bonaparte; Kaiser Wilhelm II, the king of Germany at the time of the First World War; and Maximilian, the Habsburg emperor of Mexico, who died in 1867. On and on it goes into country after country. This bloodline connects into every surviving royal family in Europe, including King Juan Carlos of Spain and the Dutch, Swedish, and Danish royal lines.” -David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline” 

Before the Habsburgs, the House of Lorraine and Charlemagne were the Merovingians (Meroveus/Merovee) who originally brought the bloodline to France and Northwest Europe. Back in 4th century Rome the bloodline passed through Emperor Constantine, the first professed Christian emperor who initiated the Roman Empire’s transition into a Christian State and presided over the first Council of Nicaea. He was preceded by the Roman Piso family whom will be discussed at length later. Before them came Herod the Great of Biblical fame and Ptolemy XIV, son of the most well-known Roman emperor Julius Caesar. 

Caesar actually married into the bloodline through Cleopatra, the most well-known Egyptian Queen. A little further down this very same bloodline brings us to Alexander the Great: 

“One common link in this bloodline is Philip of Macedonia (382-336BC),who married Olympias, and their son was Alexander the Great (356-323BC), a tyrant who plundered that key region of Greece, Persia, Syria, Phoenicia, Egypt, Babylon, the former lands of Sumer, and across into India before dying in Babylon at the age of 33. During his rule of Egypt he founded the city of Alexandria, one the greatest centers for esoteric knowledge in the ancient world. Alexander was taught by the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, who in turn was taught by Plato and he by Socrates. The bloodline and the hidden advanced knowledge have always gone together.” -David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline” 

Back the bloodline goes past Alexander, past Nebuchadnezzar IV, III and other Kings of Babylon, all the way to ancient African Kings and Pharaohs of Egypt – Ramesis II, I, Tuthmosis IV, III, II, I, Amenhotep III, II, I and many more. For millennia these Kings, Queens, Pharaohs, and Emperors have obsessively interbred with themselves to preserve and spread their bloodline. They have ruled over us since the beginning of recorded history, claiming they were given divine right to the throne by God or gods. 

“This ‘Divine right’ is simply the right to rule by DNA. We have a head of state in Britain to this day who is only there because of her DNA and the whole freeloading hierarchy of the royal family is structured according to a person’s DNA relationship to the king or queen …what is royal rule by DNA if not outrageous racial and genetic elitism? 

This ‘Divine’ right to rule has nothing to do with the ‘Divine’ and everything to do with the real origin of these bloodlines. They claim to descend from the ‘gods’ of the ancient world and who or what these ‘gods’ were and are, I will explain in detail later. 

The ‘royal’ families have interbred incessantly with each other since ancient times because they are seeking to retain the DNA corruption that can apparently be quickly diluted by breeding outside of itself. 

How interesting that the families of the Illuminati and the power elite do the same to this day. Why? They are the same bloodlines. The royal ‘Divine’ bloodlines of ancient Sumer and Babylon (now Iraq), Egypt, the Indus Valley and elsewhere expanded into Europe to become the royal and aristocratic families that ruled that continent and most of the world through the British Empire and those of France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and so on. As the people began to challenge and reject the open dictatorship of royal rule the bloodlines began to move ‘underground’ by operating among the population in all the areas that control modern society …

You will find a similar story all over the world. Credo Mutwa, the official historian of the Zulu nation, told me how so many black African leaders that were placed in power after the colonial masters gave the continent ‘independence’, came from the bloodlines of African kings and queens who claimed to descend from the same ‘gods’ as their white counterparts.” -David Icke, “Tales from the Time Loop”

#ImJustHereToMakeYouThink

Sources: https://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------